Cleanest/Best Watersheds

National Average

Dirtiest/Worst Watersheds

0%					50%					100%

Percentage of Surface Waters with Impaired or Threatened Uses (state + EPA data):

Number of Impaired Waterbodies (as reported by the state):

NOTE: Data limitations affect the accuracy of these rankings.

Rank watersheds by assessed use impairments
Rank counties by assessed use impairments.
Rank states by assessed use impairments, impairments due to specific causes, or impairments due to specific sources

Lower Pee Dee contains a portion of 9 counties:

ANSON County, NC

CHESTERFIELD County, SC

DARLINGTON County, SC

DILLON County, SC

FLORENCE County, SC

GEORGETOWN County, SC

MARION County, SC

MARLBORO County, SC

RICHMOND County, NC

Percentage of Surface Waters with Reported Problems (state + EPA data): 100%

Number of Waterbodies with Reported Problems (as reported by the state): 28

Beneficial Use Most Frequently Impaired	Percent of All Impairments
Aquatic Life Support	44%
Primary Contact Recreation (Swimming)	41%
Overall Use	26%
Fish Consumption	4%

Priority for Regulation	Number of Waterbodies
Targeted	0
High	6
Medium	12
Low	9
Not Assessed for TMDL Priority	1
Not Reported to US EPA for TMDL Priority	0

Rivers, Streams, and Creeks
Number of impaired waterbodies: 20(cause not reported for 10%)
Percent of Rivers, Streams and Creeks in NORTH CAROLINA assessed by agencies for 1997-98 reporting period: 89%
Percent of Rivers, Streams and Creeks in SOUTH CAROLINA assessed by agencies for 1997-98 reporting period: 65%

	Percent Waterbodies Affected
Pathogens	35%
Sediments	20%
pH	20%
Impaired Biological Community	15%
Metals	15%
More...

NOTE: Possible inconsistencies between data on (a) impaired waterbodies and (b) percentage of waterbodies assessed.

Rivers, Streams, and Creeks
Number of impaired waterbodies: 20(cause not reported for 70%)
Percent of Rivers, Streams and Creeks in NORTH CAROLINA assessed by agencies for 1997-98 reporting period: 89%
Percent of Rivers, Streams and Creeks in SOUTH CAROLINA assessed by agencies for 1997-98 reporting period: 65%

	Percent Waterbodies Affected
Impairment source not reported	70%
Nonpoint Sources	30%

NOTE: Possible inconsistencies between data on (a) impaired waterbodies and (b) percentage of waterbodies assessed.

U.S. EPA Watershed Health Index

U.S. EPA Condition and Vulnerability Indicators

U.S. EPA Watershed Profile

U.S. Geological Survey: Water Resources Links