POLLUTION LOCATOR| Water | Watershed Impairment

Clean Water Act Status: Little Pee Dee Watershed
 
 
  • Clean Water Act Comparative Ranking
    Cleanest/Best Watersheds National Average Dirtiest/Worst Watersheds
    0%         50%         100%

    Percentage of Surface Waters with Impaired or Threatened Uses (state + EPA data):
    Number of Impaired Waterbodies (as reported by the state):

    NOTE: Data limitations affect the accuracy of these rankings.

    Rank watersheds by assessed use impairments
    Rank counties by assessed use impairments.
    Rank states by assessed use impairments, impairments due to specific causes, or impairments due to specific sources

  •   [ top ]
     
     
  • 1998 Clean Water Act Status
    Little Pee Dee contains a portion of 7 counties:
    DILLON County, SC
    HORRY County, SC
    MARION County, SC
    MARLBORO County, SC
    RICHMOND County, NC
    ROBESON County, NC
    SCOTLAND County, NC
    Percentage of Surface Waters with Reported Problems (state + EPA data): 100%
    Number of Waterbodies with Reported Problems (as reported by the state): 8
    Brown Swp At S-34-31
    Buck Swp At S-17-33
    Buck Swp At S-17-33
    Little Pee Dee At S-34-60
    Little Pee Dee River Drainage, Freshwater Portions Only
    Little Pee Dee Rvr @s-34-60
    Little Shoe Heel Creek
    Maple Swp At Sc 57
    Beneficial Use Most Frequently Impaired Percent of All Impairments
    Aquatic Life Support 38%
    Primary Contact Recreation (Swimming) 38%
    Fish Consumption 12%
    Overall Use 12%


    Priority for Regulation     Number of Waterbodies
    Targeted 0
    High 2
    Medium 3
    Low 3
    Not Assessed for TMDL Priority 0
    Not Reported to US EPA for TMDL Priority 0
  •   [ top ]
     
     
  • Leading Pollutants/Stressors of Surface Waters
    Rivers, Streams, and Creeks
    Number of impaired waterbodies: 4(cause not reported for 25%)
    Percent of Rivers, Streams and Creeks in NORTH CAROLINA assessed by agencies for 1997-98 reporting period: 89%
    Percent of Rivers, Streams and Creeks in SOUTH CAROLINA assessed by agencies for 1997-98 reporting period: 65%
      Percent Waterbodies Affected
    Metals 50%
    Impairment cause not reported 25%
    Mercury 25%

    NOTE: Possible inconsistencies between data on (a) impaired waterbodies and (b) percentage of waterbodies assessed.






    Fresh Water Wetlands
    Number of impaired waterbodies: 4
      Percent Waterbodies Affected
    Pathogens 75%
    Low Dissolved Oxygen/Organic Enrichment 25%

    NOTE: Possible inconsistencies between data on (a) impaired waterbodies and (b) percentage of waterbodies assessed.
  •   [ top ]
     
     
  • Leading Sources of Water Quality Problems
    Rivers, Streams, and Creeks
    Number of impaired waterbodies: 4(cause not reported for 100%)
    Percent of Rivers, Streams and Creeks in NORTH CAROLINA assessed by agencies for 1997-98 reporting period: 89%
    Percent of Rivers, Streams and Creeks in SOUTH CAROLINA assessed by agencies for 1997-98 reporting period: 65%
      Percent Waterbodies Affected
    Impairment source not reported 100%

    NOTE: Possible inconsistencies between data on (a) impaired waterbodies and (b) percentage of waterbodies assessed.






    Fresh Water Wetlands
    Number of impaired waterbodies: 4(cause not reported for 100%)
      Percent Waterbodies Affected
    Impairment source not reported 100%

    NOTE: Possible inconsistencies between data on (a) impaired waterbodies and (b) percentage of waterbodies assessed.
  •   [ top ]
     
      [ top ]
     
     
  • Links
    U.S. EPA Watershed Health Index
    U.S. EPA Condition and Vulnerability Indicators
    U.S. EPA Watershed Profile
    U.S. Geological Survey: Water Resources Links
  •   [ top ]